hm, crap. I wish I'd asked him this on the first call. Calling back with suspicions isn't a great way to start a relationship, if it's legit. What do you want to do? On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

What frequency is TER? Also, what are their FCC call letters? A quick google didn't show any station in California with call letters of KTER. and the phone number given is apparentlty for a cellular account based in Hayward, all of which makes me suspicious!

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:58 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, , (510) 962-5693

Here's the scoop:

He has a group of non-profits/charitable, local community organizations he says he "kind of cycles through," giving them a (brief) voice on a regular basis (it sounds like he interviews for 15 minutes & edits to 5 minutes). The person who speaks to them (which doesn't have to be the same person) and/or the organization decides the topic for each interview; I'm sure he decides which ones really work for him, too.

The first appointment available to us is either today-- he has one slot left, between 2:30pm & 4pm -- or Friday, when he's pretty open.

Do we want to open with talking about the wild parrots of SF and how we care for them (Jennifer)? - always a good attention getter. This will also be a venue for talking about Rio, the movie, when it comes out, and macaws in general.

I suspect the radio station is not highly listened to, so my hopes are not high that this will give us incredible exposure, but any exposure is good exposure (except that brutal divorce situation), so they say.

I don't necessarily think pitching that everyone vote for us on pepsi would be the best way to open? - I'm wondering if we want to save that pitch for March or whenever we go back to that, to give more bang for the buck at that point.

What does this group want to do? p

I'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light. Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk. Guidance, anyone? pI'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light. Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk. Guidance, anyone? p On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

I am sorry to raise suspicions about what is probably a legitimate opportunity for PR, but I'm remembering the last 8+ months of James Spaid and his minions showing up like whack-a-moles in one venue after another trying to make Mickaboo look bad, and the vitriol that some bird sellers expressed at the SF hearings last year. It's quite possible that this is a tiny, grass-roots station (perhaps Internet-only?) without a lot of credentials, that is genuinely trying to help non-profits like ours. But I think that some disclosure on their end is at least highly desirable.

Could you call back and get his email address, claiming that email is a better way to reach you? If he gives you a personal address instead of one that ties back to his station, that is another point of concern, IMO. You can also thank him for helping NPOs, etc. and ask for his call letters and frequency so that you can listen to his station. Any good radio guy should be anxious to give out such information!

Also, can we, in general, opt out of having an interview aired after we have started participating in the interview? I am thinking of exit strategy in case the interviewer begins going off on the wrong topic.

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:11 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693 Importance: High

hm, crap. I wish I'd asked him this on the first call. Calling back with suspicions isn't a great way to start a relationship, if it's legit. What do you want to do?

On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

...

What frequency is TER? Also, what are their FCC call letters? A quick google didn't show any station in California with call letters of KTER. and the phone number given is apparentlty for a cellular account based in Hayward, all of which makes me suspicious!

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:58 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, , (510) 962-5693

Here's the scoop:

He has a group of non-profits/charitable, local community organizations he says he "kind of cycles through," giving them a (brief) voice on a regular basis (it sounds like he interviews for 15 minutes & edits to 5 minutes). The person who speaks to them (which doesn't have to be the same person) and/or the organization decides the topic for each interview; I'm sure he decides which ones really work for him, too.

The first appointment available to us is either today-- he has one slot left, between 2:30pm & 4pm -- or Friday, when he's pretty open.

Do we want to open with talking about the wild parrots of SF and how we care for them (Jennifer)? - always a good attention getter. This will also be a venue for talking about Rio, the movie, when it comes out, and macaws in general.

I suspect the radio station is not highly listened to, so my hopes are not high that this will give us incredible exposure, but any exposure is good exposure (except that brutal divorce situation), so they say.

I don't necessarily think pitching that everyone vote for us on pepsi would be the best way to open? - I'm wondering if we want to save that pitch for March or whenever we go back to that, to give more bang for the buck at that point.

What does this group want to do? p

No I only read the text. Is the vocal message different (more complete)? On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Michelle Yesney wrote:

I'll do it on Friday, if we can find anything confirming that he is a real person. I would think that asking what kind of radio station is "TER" is a reasonable question.

Did you listen to his voice message, Patty?

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Patricia Blau wrote: I'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light.

Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk.

Guidance, anyone? pI'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light.

Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk.

Guidance, anyone? p

On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

...

I am sorry to raise suspicions about what is probably a legitimate opportunity for PR, but I'm remembering the last 8+ months of James Spaid and his minions showing up like whack-a-moles in one venue after another trying to make Mickaboo look bad, and the vitriol that some bird sellers expressed at the SF hearings last year. It's quite possible that this is a tiny, grass-roots station (perhaps Internet-only?) without a lot of credentials, that is genuinely trying to help non-profits like ours. But I think that some disclosure on their end is at least highly desirable.

Could you call back and get his email address, claiming that email is a better way to reach you? If he gives you a personal address instead of one that ties back to his station, that is another point of concern, IMO. You can also thank him for helping NPOs, etc. and ask for his call letters and frequency so that you can listen to his station. Any good radio guy should be anxious to give out such information!

Also, can we, in general, opt out of having an interview aired after we have started participating in the interview? I am thinking of exit strategy in case the interviewer begins going off on the wrong topic.

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:11 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693 Importance: High

hm, crap. I wish I'd asked him this on the first call. Calling back with suspicions isn't a great way to start a relationship, if it's legit. What do you want to do?

On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

...

What frequency is TER? Also, what are their FCC call letters? A quick google didn't show any station in California with call letters of KTER. and the phone number given is apparentlty for a cellular account based in Hayward, all of which makes me suspicious!

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:58 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, , (510) 962-5693

Here's the scoop:

He has a group of non-profits/charitable, local community organizations he says he "kind of cycles through," giving them a (brief) voice on a regular basis (it sounds like he interviews for 15 minutes & edits to 5 minutes). The person who speaks to them (which doesn't have to be the same person) and/or the organization decides the topic for each interview; I'm sure he decides which ones really work for him, too.

The first appointment available to us is either today-- he has one slot left, between 2:30pm & 4pm -- or Friday, when he's pretty open.

Do we want to open with talking about the wild parrots of SF and how we care for them (Jennifer)? - always a good attention getter. This will also be a venue for talking about Rio, the movie, when it comes out, and macaws in general.

I suspect the radio station is not highly listened to, so my hopes are not high that this will give us incredible exposure, but any exposure is good exposure (except that brutal divorce situation), so they say.

I don't necessarily think pitching that everyone vote for us on pepsi would be the best way to open? - I'm wondering if we want to save that pitch for March or whenever we go back to that, to give more bang for the buck at that point.

What does this group want to do? p

THat sounds very reasonable.  Scott Shipley Mickaboo Companion Bird Rescue Macaw Co-Coordinator and 'Too Team ________________________________ From: Karen Watkins To: Mickaboo media advisor team Sent: Tue, January 25, 2011 6:12:51 PM Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693 I think someone who has a bit of distance from the lawsuit would be a better choice for the interview.   From:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 5:13 PM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693   No I only read the text.  Is the vocal message different (more complete)?       On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Michelle Yesney wrote: I'll do it on Friday, if we can find anything confirming that he is a real person.  I would think that asking what kind of radio station is "TER" is a reasonable question.   Did you listen to his voice message, Patty?   On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Patricia Blau wrote: I'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light. Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including:  "I can't talk about that, goodbye."  It's a risk. Guidance, anyone? pI'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light. Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including:  "I can't talk about that, goodbye."  It's a risk. Guidance, anyone? p On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

I am sorry to raise suspicions about what is probably a legitimate opportunity for PR, but I'm remembering the last 8+ months of James Spaid and his minions showing up like whack-a-moles in one venue after another trying to make Mickaboo look bad, and the vitriol that some bird sellers expressed at the SF hearings last year. It's quite possible that this is a tiny, grass-roots station (perhaps Internet-only?) without a lot of credentials, that is genuinely trying to help non-profits like ours. But I think that some disclosure on their end is at least highly desirable.

Could you call back and get his email address, claiming that email is a better way to reach you? If he gives you a personal address instead of one that ties back to his station, that is another point of concern, IMO. You can also thank him for helping NPOs, etc. and ask for his call letters and frequency so that you can listen to his station. Any good radio guy should be anxious to give out such information!

Also, can we, in general, opt out of having an interview aired after we have started participating in the interview? I am thinking of exit strategy in case the interviewer begins going off on the wrong topic.

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:11 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693 Importance: High

hm, crap.  I wish I'd asked him this on the first call.  Calling back with suspicions isn't a great way to start a relationship, if it's legit.   What do you want to do?

On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

...

What frequency is TER? Also, what are their FCC call letters? A quick google didn't show any station in California with call letters of KTER. and the phone number given is apparentlty for a cellular account based in Hayward, all of which makes me suspicious!

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:58 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, , (510) 962-5693

Here's the scoop:

He has a group of non-profits/charitable, local community organizations he says he "kind of cycles through," giving them a (brief) voice on a regular basis (it sounds like he interviews for 15 minutes & edits to 5 minutes). The person who speaks to them (which doesn't have to be the same person) and/or the organization decides the topic for each interview; I'm sure he decides which ones really work for him, too.

The first appointment available to us is either today-- he has one slot left, between 2:30pm & 4pm -- or Friday, when he's pretty open.

Do we want to open with talking about the wild parrots of SF and how we care for them (Jennifer)?  - always a good attention getter.  This will also be a venue for talking about Rio, the movie, when it comes out, and macaws in general.

I suspect the radio station is not highly listened to, so my hopes are not high that this will give us incredible exposure, but any exposure is good exposure (except that brutal divorce situation), so they say.

I don't necessarily think pitching that everyone vote for us on pepsi would be the best way to open?  - I'm wondering if we want to save that pitch for March or whenever we go back to that, to give more bang for the buck at that point.

What does this group want to do? p

Did we figure out which ratio station he actually works for? On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 9:11 PM, Patricia Blau wrote:

Ok. Do you want to call him & set it up to work with your schedule?

p

On Jan 25, 2011, at 1:55 PM, Michelle Yesney wrote:

I'll do it on Friday, if we can find anything confirming that he is a real person. I would think that asking what kind of radio station is "TER" is a reasonable question.

Did you listen to his voice message, Patty?

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 12:32 PM, Patricia Blau wrote:

...

I'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light.

Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk.

Guidance, anyone? pI'll call back for that info, but I'd like to include who's going to be the first interviewee, to get an appointment for Friday (assuming all is legit)-- we can cancel if other things come to light.

Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk.

Guidance, anyone? p

On Jan 25, 2011, at 11:46 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

...

I am sorry to raise suspicions about what is probably a legitimate opportunity for PR, but I'm remembering the last 8+ months of James Spaid and his minions showing up like whack-a-moles in one venue after another trying to make Mickaboo look bad, and the vitriol that some bird sellers expressed at the SF hearings last year. It's quite possible that this is a tiny, grass-roots station (perhaps Internet-only?) without a lot of credentials, that is genuinely trying to help non-profits like ours. But I think that some disclosure on their end is at least highly desirable.

Could you call back and get his email address, claiming that email is a better way to reach you? If he gives you a personal address instead of one that ties back to his station, that is another point of concern, IMO. You can also thank him for helping NPOs, etc. and ask for his call letters and frequency so that you can listen to his station. Any good radio guy should be anxious to give out such information!

Also, can we, in general, opt out of having an interview aired after we have started participating in the interview? I am thinking of exit strategy in case the interviewer begins going off on the wrong topic.

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:11 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693 Importance: High

hm, crap. I wish I'd asked him this on the first call. Calling back with suspicions isn't a great way to start a relationship, if it's legit. What do you want to do?

On Jan 25, 2011, at 10:26 AM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:

...

What frequency is TER? Also, what are their FCC call letters? A quick google didn't show any station in California with call letters of KTER. and the phone number given is apparentlty for a cellular account based in Hayward, all of which makes me suspicious!

--VH

-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 9:58 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, , (510) 962-5693

Here's the scoop:

He has a group of non-profits/charitable, local community organizations he says he "kind of cycles through," giving them a (brief) voice on a regular basis (it sounds like he interviews for 15 minutes & edits to 5 minutes). The person who speaks to them (which doesn't have to be the same person) and/or the organization decides the topic for each interview; I'm sure he decides which ones really work for him, too.

The first appointment available to us is either today-- he has one slot left, between 2:30pm & 4pm -- or Friday, when he's pretty open.

Do we want to open with talking about the wild parrots of SF and how we care for them (Jennifer)? - always a good attention getter. This will also be a venue for talking about Rio, the movie, when it comes out, and macaws in general.

I suspect the radio station is not highly listened to, so my hopes are not high that this will give us incredible exposure, but any exposure is good exposure (except that brutal divorce situation), so they say.

I don't necessarily think pitching that everyone vote for us on pepsi would be the best way to open? - I'm wondering if we want to save that pitch for March or whenever we go back to that, to give more bang for the buck at that point.

What does this group want to do? p

Yes, something along that line would be appropriate. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Elizabeth Young wrote:

*Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk.

Guidance, anyone?*

Regardless of who asks us about the Spaid suit (I'll leave it to others to investigate this potential interviewer), could we not say something to the effect of:

Regarding the Spaid accusations, Mickaboo had the misfortune of receiving three cockatiels surrendered, with signatures attesting to it, that then became the focus of a custody battle in a divorce. Mickaboo followed procedures and complied with the law every step of the way and the birds have been returned per the judge's decision. Mickaboo's only interest in the matter was to uphold our responsibility to the welfare of the birds. Slanderous things have been said about our organization and it is very hurtful to the volunteers who work so hard to take care of the birds that nobody else will. Next question.

??

e

-- Elizabeth

*PLEASE vote for Mickaboo & 'Coo Bird Rescues today **& every day* *this month to help us win a MUCH needed $50K grant! * ** www.refresheverything.com/mickaboobirdrescue

Until they all have homes, don't buy, don't breed- adopt. www.RescueReport.org http://www.rescuereport.org/ www.MickaCoo.org http://www.mickacoo.org/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGjyooh3Yo0

I just listened to the message and I think it's KEZR not TER. There's definitely a K, and he kind of swallows the middle letters. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:25 PM, Michelle Yesney wrote:

Also, I would hope that anyone doing an interview for Mickaboo who feels they are being harassed or subjected to some kind of highly partisan treatment would feel comfortable telling the interviewer that s/he was behaving in an unprofessional manner and then terminating the conversation (easier to do on the phone).

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:23 PM, Michelle Yesney wrote:

...

Yes, something along that line would be appropriate.

On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Elizabeth Young wrote:

...

*Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk.

Guidance, anyone?*

Regardless of who asks us about the Spaid suit (I'll leave it to others to investigate this potential interviewer), could we not say something to the effect of:

Regarding the Spaid accusations, Mickaboo had the misfortune of receiving three cockatiels surrendered, with signatures attesting to it, that then became the focus of a custody battle in a divorce. Mickaboo followed procedures and complied with the law every step of the way and the birds have been returned per the judge's decision. Mickaboo's only interest in the matter was to uphold our responsibility to the welfare of the birds. Slanderous things have been said about our organization and it is very hurtful to the volunteers who work so hard to take care of the birds that nobody else will. Next question.

??

e

-- Elizabeth

*PLEASE vote for Mickaboo & 'Coo Bird Rescues today **& every day* *this month to help us win a MUCH needed $50K grant! * ** www.refresheverything.com/mickaboobirdrescue

Until they all have homes, don't buy, don't breed- adopt. www.RescueReport.org http://www.rescuereport.org/ www.MickaCoo.org http://www.mickacoo.org/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGjyooh3Yo0

I would add that we provided animal rescue services in what was perceived to be a domestic abuse situation and we found that the legal system does not take conditions under which animals are surrendered into consideration. From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Michelle Yesney Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 2:23 PM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693 Yes, something along that line would be appropriate. On Tue, Jan 25, 2011 at 2:20 PM, Elizabeth Young wrote: Once we're talking, if he starts asking about the suit, I don't know that there is anything we can do to stop him from airing what we say, including: "I can't talk about that, goodbye." It's a risk. Guidance, anyone? Regardless of who asks us about the Spaid suit (I'll leave it to others to investigate this potential interviewer), could we not say something to the effect of: Regarding the Spaid accusations, Mickaboo had the misfortune of receiving three cockatiels surrendered, with signatures attesting to it, that then became the focus of a custody battle in a divorce. Mickaboo followed procedures and complied with the law every step of the way and the birds have been returned per the judge's decision. Mickaboo's only interest in the matter was to uphold our responsibility to the welfare of the birds. Slanderous things have been said about our organization and it is very hurtful to the volunteers who work so hard to take care of the birds that nobody else will. Next question. ?? e -- Elizabeth PLEASE vote for Mickaboo & 'Coo Bird Rescues today & every day this month to help us win a MUCH needed $50K grant! <http://www.refresheverything.com/mickaboobirdresc ue> www.refresheverything.com/mickaboobirdrescue Until they all have homes, don't buy, don't breed- adopt. www.RescueReport.org http://www.rescuereport.org/ www.MickaCoo.org http://www.mickacoo.org/ http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGjyooh3Yo0

I think I would avoid using the term "slander" in case it inflames people further, regardless of how accurate it is.

I agree. I would change that sentence to say that "inaccurate, defamatory things have been said" instead of "slanderous." We can easily maintain that a statement is incorrect (for example, their saying that we "broke into" their home when there is no police report to that effect), but slander is something that should probably be proven in a court of law, IMO. People have explicitly said that they intend to use this to destroy our organization. Last I heard, they were still saying that the fact that one of these birds got cancer is Mickaboo's fault. Having followed this closely for the duration, I would treat this topic as extremely incendiary, probably a show-stopper at first mention, and would not expect to skate by on a pat answer, no matter how well-parsed. --VH

The topic is communirty service and volunteerism, not advocacy.

And Glenn Beck is a self-proclaimed civil rights advocate. What's your point? Has anyone here ever heard a Jonathan Ricker interview anybody about anything? If not, then we have no idea what we are in for. --VH

A community service promo is very different than discussing the rights of animals to food and shelter and safety. We don't need red herrings, Vinny. From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Vincent J. Hrovat Sent: Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:18 PM To: 'Mickaboo media advisor team' Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Jonathan Ricker, T E R radio in SF, (510) 962-5693

The topic is communirty service and volunteerism, not advocacy.

And Glenn Beck is a self-proclaimed civil rights advocate. What's your point? Has anyone here ever heard a Jonathan Ricker interview anybody about anything? If not, then we have no idea what we are in for. --VH