- Media-advisors - mickaboo.org

Re: [Media-advisors] Fw: Re: Mickaboo, False and True (was Lies and Misstatements draft)
by Marthak816＠gmail.com 18 Jul '10

18 Jul '10

Such a binary point of view :) But I agree, this eliminates getting into motive. -----Original Message----- Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010 5:09:06 pm To: "Mickaboo media advisor team" <media-advisors(a)mickaboo.org> Cc: Mickaboo media advisor team <media-advisors(a)mickaboo.org> From: "AMuse" <amuse(a)foofus.com> Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Fw: Re: Mickaboo, False and True (was Lies and Misstatements draft) I'm with Michelle. False is False. On Jul 18, 2010, at 3:26 PM, Michelle Yesney <msyesney(a)gmail.com> wrote: > But it also implies a lack of intention or malice. > > False has the benefit of being straightforward and direct - the falsity could be intentional or unintentional, but we don't imply that we know which in this case. > > > > On Sun, Jul 18, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Karen Watkins <karen.watkins(a)gmail.com> wrote: > We could rename the ?FALSE? label to ?MYTH? or ?RUMOR?. I prefer MYTH because it implies a lack of knowledge by people perpetuating the myth. > > > > Karen M. Watkins > > > > From: media-advisors-bounces(a)mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Jonathan Harris > Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 11:32 AM > To: media-advisors(a)mickaboo.org > Subject: [Media-advisors] Fw: Re: Mickaboo, False and True (was Lies and Misstatements draft) > > > > Thanks, Michelle, for the good edits. I'll wait to hear from others before re-editing i

1 0

Re: [Media-advisors] Mickaboo, False and True (was Lies and Misstatements draft)
by Vincent J. Hrovat 18 Jul '10

18 Jul '10

Re-routing this thread under “Mickaboo Advisors” discussion list instead of individual email addresses. Please respond and send all subsequent emails to media-advisors(a)mickaboo.org to be sure that this routes properly and to all members of team. Thanks. --VH From: Mary Long [mailto:atechi2@yahoo.com] Sent: Sunday, July 18, 2010 10:42 AM To: Elizabeth Young; Michelle Yesney; Tammy Azzaro; Karen Watkins; Patricia Blau; Matt; Vinny; Jonathan Harris Subject: Re: Mickaboo, False and True (was Lies and Misstatements draft) This is really good - and it's a difficult job you've tackeled, boil down to basic point, most important points. I was thinking that one potentially important insertion under the profile of relinquishers - elderly or terminally infirmed owners who's family are unable/unwilling to take in the family's 20/40/80+ year old parrot. I don't know if this is common for Mickaboo, but I know that 4 parrots I share my home with came from such situation (plus Porshe/Portia, from the Martinez shelter - who was a confiscation by animal control and was offered to Mickaboo because of "aggression" (read: fearful) therefore not "adoptable" thru their shelter). --- On Sun, 7/18/10, Jonathan Harris <jonathanharris(a)earthlink.net> wrote: From: Jonathan Harris <jonathanharris(a)earthlink.net> Subject: Mickaboo, False and True (was Lies and Misstatements draft) To: "Elizabeth Young" <adoptkings(a)gmail.com>, "Michelle Yesney" <msyesney(a)gmail.com>, "Tammy Azzaro" <tammyazzaro(a)gmail.com>, "Karen Watkins" <karen.watkins(a)gmail.com>, "Patricia Blau" <pblau(a)sonic.net>, "Mary Long" <atechi2(a)yahoo.com>, "Matt" <amuse(a)foofus.com>, "Vinny" <vinny(a)vhrovat.org> Date: Sunday, July 18, 2010, 7:12 AM Here is a revised draft of the "Micakboo, False and True" document (not its intended title, but a closer description of its content than "Lies and Misstatements." I've suggested a possible title, below). Matt's corrected figures, Michelle's edits, and Elizabeth's and Mary's suggestion now are incorporated; the rhetoric of the third paragraph is toned down slightly; and the phrases "Ridiculously False" and "The Biggest Lie" have been replaced with the simpler "False," as per Vinny's suggestion. It does, however, retain the original True-False format, since that was the document's intended purpose — to refute the mischaracterizations presented at the July 8 AWC meeting and in ongoing propaganda — and that purpose is integral to the structure and content of document. We can tweak this further (e.g., add the names of more SF pet stores, boutiques, service centers, etc., especially if/when we start working with them); and of course it can be rewritten or broken apart for future purposes. -j ---------------- Some Facts about Mickaboo Companion Bird Rescue and the Crisis of Unwanted Birds A great deal of misinformation is being spread about the growing number of homeless, unwanted birds in the Bay Area. Since the San Francisco Animal Welfare Commission first mentioned adding small animals, including birds, to a proposed ban on the sale of dogs and cats in the city, a coalition of breeders and pet store owners has attempted to dismiss the problem and to discredit the organization whose representatives brought it to the commission's attention, Mickaboo Companion Bird Rescue. In testimony before the commission, in letters, flyers, and emails, they have repeatedly distorted and misrepresented the practices and purpose of this nationally respected rescue group, while denying the existence of any crisis in unwanted birds and trying to obscure its root causes. By their account, hardly any homeless or unwanted birds exist here (or anywhere else in the US). The crisis, they say, is an illusion created by rescue groups like Mickaboo for our own purposes. Mickaboo's agenda, they claim, is to profit from the adoption fees we charge; pet stores — which offer customers greater choice — are "competitors" for bird sales, and Mickaboo wants to destroy these independent businesses, limiting people's access to birds. Mickaboo's "high" fees and "burdensome" adoption procedures are what create the appearance of a crisis, since they discourage adoption and produce a backlog of unadopted birds. Mickaboo is a radical Animal Rights group whose ultimate goal is nothing less than the complete prohibition of pet ownership. This narrative is false from start to finish. Some parts actually contradict others (why should we want to prohibit pet ownership if our goal is profit from people adopting our birds?). None of it withstands any comparison with reality. But it is not simply inaccurate, it is dangerously wrong in diverting attention away from the real, emerging crisis in our city and around the country. If you care about animal welfare or your rights to have companion animals, please compare their misstatements with the facts. FALSE: There is no crisis of homeless birds. Their numbers in shelters are insignificant compared to impounded dogs and cats. THE TRUTH: There is a huge and growing crisis of unwanted birds. It has taken four centuries for the numbers of homeless dogs and cats to reach the levels they have in America today. The explosion of domestic parrot populations (now estimated at some 40–50 million in US homes) has occurred only in the past 20 years, driven by the rise of large-scale, industrial breeders and pet retailers in the 1990s. As people who purchased birds on impulse confront the difficulties and cost of caring for these complex, demanding, essentially wild animals, more and more are relinquishing them, sometimes illegally releasing or simply abandoning them. Most of these birds never reach shelters, dying from untreated illnesses and neglect at home or from starvation or predation when released. The problem has worsened during the current housing crisis and recession, as people losing their homes are simply abandoning birds, sometimes entire aviaries, at an alarming rate. Craigslist is filled with ads for unwanted birds. Mickaboo's annual intake numbers have gone from about 35 in 2002 to a projected 500 this year. If that growth rate continues, the number will reach 5,000 by 2018. Rescue groups and shelters cannot absorb such growth. Mickaboo currently has 375 rescued birds needing homes, and our volunteers' space to house them is at capacity. Recently we have been forced to impose a moratorium on the intake of cockatiels, although we know of many who need our help. All the while, more birds continue to be bred and sold. FALSE: Mickaboo hates pet stores and wants to drive them out of business. THE TRUTH: Mickaboo hates the mistreatment of animals; we do not hate pet stores. We don't want to ruin businesses, especially small, independent ones; we just want them to stop selling commercially bred birds. There are other business models pet stores can follow that don't involve selling bred animals. In the Bay Area we have both chains (Pet Food Express) and independent stores (For Other Living Things, Sunnyvale) that provide goods and services for companion animals, as well as pet stores (Andy's, San Jose) that sell only re-homed animals). We regret the effect banning bird sales might have on the income of some pet stores and their employees, many of whom genuinely love animals. However, the issue cannot be reduced simply to the economic interests of these stores. So long as pet stores promote birds as easy-care or "starter" pets, they will create unrealistic expectations, frustrated owners and countless miserable, unwanted birds. Moreover, even the most responsible pet sellers — stores that treat their birds well and provide good information and guidance to prospective buyers — are supplied by and support large breeding operations that rival puppy mills in life-long cruelty toward their captive breeding animals. Such extreme mistreatment of highly intelligent, emotionally sensitive creatures cannot be justified, tolerated, or supported, even indirectly. FALSE: Mickaboo earns profits through its adoption fees. THE TRUTH: Mickaboo is a 501(c)3 organization, run entirely by volunteers. It does not make money on anything, nor does anyone who works for it. Even without physical facilities or paid employees, the cost of our rescue work is staggering. Many of our rescued birds need expensive and prolonged medical treatment, and Mickaboo spends on average more than $10,000 per month for veterinary care. Adoption fees defray a small fraction (less than 15%) of those costs. The rest comes mainly from donations and few, small fund-raisers. Our finances are a matter of public record. What the records do not show are the many additional costs that Mickaboo's volunteers absorb themselves — food, transportation and toys for their foster birds — to say nothing of the countless hours of skilled and loving labor they give to emotional rehabilitation and socialization, getting once neglected and abused animals to trust people again. FALSE: Mickaboo's "high" adoption fees and "burdensome" procedures discourage adoption. THE TRUTH: Mickaboo's adoption fees are in most cases less than what the same bird would cost if purchased from a pet store or breeder. Our adoption procedure requires people to take a basic bird-care class, fill out a questionnaire, be interviewed over the phone, and have a home visit. We do not consider these requirements burdensome, in light of the past treatment some of our birds have suffered, the investment we have made in rehabilitating them, and the lifelong commitment we make to their welfare. Nor should anyone who is serious about having birds in their home, given the long-term responsibilities their care demands. We are not trying to put up barriers to adoption. Our goal is to educate adopters and to be sure they are able and willing to provide safe, healthy, and permanent homes for our birds. Pet stores are only required by law to provide a one-page care sheet (often containing out-of-date or erroneous information) to send home with the animal. Certainly it is easier to walk into a pet shop and buy a bird than it is to adopt from us or any other reputable rescue organization. But it is exactly that kind of impulse buying we want to discourage. A person too impatient to go through an adoption process is probably not patient enough to care for a parrot. Someone unwilling to pay a modest adoption fee is not likely to spend the money that avian veterinary care will cost. FALSE: Mickaboo refuses to work with pet stores on finding solutions. THE TRUTH: Besides working with most of the Bay Area's animal shelters, Mickaboo cooperates with several local stores, including Pet Food Express, Andy's Pet Shop in San Jose, and For Other Living Things in Sunnyvale, holding our public classes and adoption fairs at their facilities. We are grateful to anyone else trying to help animals in need, and we will be happy to work with other pet stores as soon as they stop selling live, bred animals. It is not helpful to our cause to promote businesses that continue to sell commercially bred birds, thereby creating the tragic problems we are working so hard to solve. FALSE: Mickaboo is ideologically opposed to people having pets and wants to outlaw it. THE TRUTH: Mickaboo was founded and is run entirely by people who love animals and have many in our own homes. We could not devote the hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars to rescue and rehabilitation work if we didn't. Our concerns are simply that people make informed choices about acquiring birds and be committed to giving them the attention and care they need. We support responsible pet keeping in many concrete ways. MIckaboo's Web site offers a wealth of information on bird behavior, health and care for the public to read and download. Mickaboo teaches free classes in basic bird care about every two weeks at locations around the Bay Area. We also offer classes on more advanced topics ranging from foraging to lighting to understanding bird body language. And every person who fosters or adopts a bird from Mickaboo automatically becomes part of an active, Web-based discussion group providing support, expert, personal advice, and sometimes emergency help to volunteers and their birds. Mickaboo needs more caring, responsible people, not fewer, to join us in adopting and fostering homeless birds — ours as well as the many beyond our reach. If you are interested in adopting or fostering a bird or would like to attend one of our classes, volunteer or donate, please visit http://www.mickaboo.org/ or phone 650-450-9104. -----Original Message----- From: Elizabeth Young Sent: Jul 17, 2010 11:43 PM To: Michelle Yesney , Tammy Azzaro , Karen Watkins , Patricia Blau , Mary Long , Jonathan Harris , Matt , Vinny Subject: Re: Lies and Misstatements draft Hi folks- Sleepless in SF here. Just wondering what's going to be happening with this powerful piece. I'd like to post it on my blog and share it with lots of folks and am hoping y'all are going to be doing the same with contacts/venues that you're aware of. Jonathan- do you have a final, proofed version? Please advise. Thanks! e

2 2

Fun with press releases
by Vincent J. Hrovat 16 Jul '10

16 Jul '10

To counter the misinformational claims that Mickaboo does not work with pet stores or shelters, I'm thinking that we should put together press releases detailing these collaborations. For example, we create a release entitled "Mickaboo extends its grooming clinic schedule at For Other Living Things." This would give us a hook to detail our relationship with FOLT and other pet stores. Likewise, a "Mickaboo participates in HSSV adoption fair" press release (for example) would give us a place to provide details about a few of our relationships with shelters. These may seem like pretty softball topics - perhaps they are -- but corporate America uses press releases as marketing vehicles all the time. These would let more people know what we do, as some people are more likely to read a press release than other forms of communication. And they wouldn't have to mention the proposed SF ban or any other legislation at all so they wouldn't be pushing anyone's buttons. I know that Patti Blau is on vacation and I might just draft up a few such releases myself to see what you all think. Comments? Vincent J. Hrovat

4 4

Re: [Media-advisors] More SF Pet Stores
by Pamela Lee 16 Jul '10

16 Jul '10

The sunset pet supply store listed here is the one I referenced earlier. 2 stores in sf - both of which have no live animal sales Sent from my Peek -- Pam ------------------------------------- Karen Watkins<karen.watkins(a)gmail.com> wrote: Amore Animal Supplies 696 Valencia St. Critters Fritters Pet Foods & Supplies 670 Chenery St. Barry for Pets 1840 Fillmore Mings Poultry 1136 Grant St. Pet Central 660 Broadway Hollywood Dog Grooming 3236 Geary St. Drew's K-9 Korner 3518 Geary St. Sally Running Dog 2247 Sutter St. Green Pawz 772 Stanyan St. Bernal Beast 509 Cortland K9 Intel, Pro Dog Training 1618 Great Highway (owner describes herself as "lifelong advocate for the well being of animals") Dosha Dog 1628 21st Ave. Puppy Haven 772 Stanyan Sunset Pet Supply Ocean Beach 3809 Noriega St. Mario's World 501 Broderick Little Fox Wear 3150 18th St. Bernie's Grooming 1200 15th St. Vavadog 735 Fillmore St. Next Gen Memorials 1200 Francisco Unleashed 1600 Armstrong Ave. Oglesby & Associates 648 28th St. Little Ark Grooming Shop 748 14th St. Bon Voyage Petsitting 2710 Union St. Earthwhile Endeavors 290 Division St. The Dog Spa 169 West Portal Ave. LeMarcel Bakery for Dogs 2066 Union St. San Francisco Raw Feeders 250 Napoleon St. Taehee's Grooming and Pet Supply 542 Divisadero Earthbath 231 9th St. Renaissance Urn Company 502 Roosevelt Embarkadero Social Club 1766 Mission St. Ok. I'm tired. There are still more..will have to wait until Saturday. I'm training two people for home visits tomorrow. Let me know if you are familiar with these businesses and whether they sell live animals. Thanks, Karen M. Watkins

1 0

Re: [Media-advisors] Lies and Misstatements draft
by Jonathan Harris 16 Jul '10

16 Jul '10

1 0

Lies and Misstatements draft
by Jonathan Harris 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

4 3

More SF Pet Stores
by Karen Watkins 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

Amore Animal Supplies 696 Valencia St. Critters Fritters Pet Foods & Supplies 670 Chenery St. Barry for Pets 1840 Fillmore Mings Poultry 1136 Grant St. Pet Central 660 Broadway Hollywood Dog Grooming 3236 Geary St. Drew's K-9 Korner 3518 Geary St. Sally Running Dog 2247 Sutter St. Green Pawz 772 Stanyan St. Bernal Beast 509 Cortland K9 Intel, Pro Dog Training 1618 Great Highway (owner describes herself as "lifelong advocate for the well being of animals") Dosha Dog 1628 21st Ave. Puppy Haven 772 Stanyan Sunset Pet Supply Ocean Beach 3809 Noriega St. Mario's World 501 Broderick Little Fox Wear 3150 18th St. Bernie's Grooming 1200 15th St. Vavadog 735 Fillmore St. Next Gen Memorials 1200 Francisco Unleashed 1600 Armstrong Ave. Oglesby & Associates 648 28th St. Little Ark Grooming Shop 748 14th St. Bon Voyage Petsitting 2710 Union St. Earthwhile Endeavors 290 Division St. The Dog Spa 169 West Portal Ave. LeMarcel Bakery for Dogs 2066 Union St. San Francisco Raw Feeders 250 Napoleon St. Taehee's Grooming and Pet Supply 542 Divisadero Earthbath 231 9th St. Renaissance Urn Company 502 Roosevelt Embarkadero Social Club 1766 Mission St. Ok. I'm tired. There are still more..will have to wait until Saturday. I'm training two people for home visits tomorrow. Let me know if you are familiar with these businesses and whether they sell live animals. Thanks, Karen M. Watkins

2 1

Leafletting/Petitions
by Karen Watkins 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

I am going to the San Francisco AidsWalk Sunday for the MCBR team. There are two of us signed up. Maybe we can pass out petitions or leaflets? Of course we have to have petitions and leaflets before we can pass them out. Does anyone know the criteria for writing a petition? Karen M. Watkins

1 0

Re: [Media-advisors] New Tasks to Prepare for Ban on Retail Pet Sales
by Marthak816＠gmail.com 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

Bow Wow Meow is a boutique chain store. At least I've been to the one in San Carlos and there was (is?) one at Stanford No animal sales. -----Original Message----- Date: Thursday, July 15, 2010 7:37:29 pm To: <Media-advisors(a)mickaboo.org> From: "Karen Watkins" <karen.watkins(a)gmail.com> Subject: [Media-advisors] New Tasks to Prepare for Ban on Retail Pet Sales We have to talk to those pet stores in San Francisco that don't sell pets and get their support for the ban. They will be the examples of pet store businesses that don't make money selling pets. The commission might be supportive of the ban but there is still a risk that birds will be omitted from the ban. We have to prepare for the Board of Supervisors approval also. I found these SF businesses on Google; let me know if any of them sell animals. Bow Wow Meow 2150 Polk St. B&B Pet Supplies 4820 Geary Blvd. North Beach Pet Supplies 801 Greenwich St. Cheeko B Pet Boutique 611 Post St. Furry Tales 255 King St. George 2411 California St. (owned by mother of Milo Foundation founder!) Babies 534 Laguna St. Jeffrey's Natural Food Co. 3809 18th Street & 1841 Powell St. Noe Valley Pet Co. 1451 Church St. Catnip and Bones 2220 Chestnut St. Cole Valley Pets 910 Cole St. Osso & Co. 501 Broderick St. Pawtrero Hill Bathhouse & Feed 199 Mississippi St. Yap Raps 900 North Point St. Bella Bean Couture 1826 Divisadero St. Cal's Pet Supply 5950 California St. Hazel & Gertie's 3385 22nd St. Sunset Pet Supply 2226 Taraval St. Bella & Daisy's 1750 Union St. The Animal House 157 Fillmore St. Cheengoo Pet Boutique 2250 Union St. #1A There's more businesses but I have to call a foster home now. We can offer good publicity to these businesses if they support us. We can ask them for quotes and even write it for them if they sign it. (I guess that's the way marketing is done now .) We can also ask them if they are willing to have bird education classes at their shops to show that we are willing to work with businesses. We aren't anti-capitalism but that's the way Fox News is seeing it. We also have to think about getting petitions circulating to submit to the Board of Supervisors. These businesses can circulate the petitions if they are supportive of the ban. Let me know if any of these businesses will be definitely be losing money with a ban. We'll focus on the others. Thanks, Karen M. Watkins

2 1

Re: [Media-advisors] New Tasks to Prepare for Ban on Retail Pet Sales
by Pamela Lee 15 Jul '10

15 Jul '10

I'll also say Sunset Pet Supply has always been open to us having a class or adoption event there. That said, the store is too small for either. Sent from my Peek -- Pam ------------------------------------- Karen Watkins<karen.watkins(a)gmail.com> wrote: We have to talk to those pet stores in San Francisco that don't sell pets and get their support for the ban. They will be the examples of pet store businesses that don't make money selling pets. The commission might be supportive of the ban but there is still a risk that birds will be omitted from the ban. We have to prepare for the Board of Supervisors approval also. I found these SF businesses on Google; let me know if any of them sell animals. Bow Wow Meow 2150 Polk St. B&B Pet Supplies 4820 Geary Blvd. North Beach Pet Supplies 801 Greenwich St. Cheeko B Pet Boutique 611 Post St. Furry Tales 255 King St. George 2411 California St. (owned by mother of Milo Foundation founder!) Babies 534 Laguna St. Jeffrey's Natural Food Co. 3809 18th Street & 1841 Powell St. Noe Valley Pet Co. 1451 Church St. Catnip and Bones 2220 Chestnut St. Cole Valley Pets 910 Cole St. Osso & Co. 501 Broderick St. Pawtrero Hill Bathhouse & Feed 199 Mississippi St. Yap Raps 900 North Point St. Bella Bean Couture 1826 Divisadero St. Cal's Pet Supply 5950 California St. Hazel & Gertie's 3385 22nd St. Sunset Pet Supply 2226 Taraval St. Bella & Daisy's 1750 Union St. The Animal House 157 Fillmore St. Cheengoo Pet Boutique 2250 Union St. #1A There's more businesses but I have to call a foster home now. We can offer good publicity to these businesses if they support us. We can ask them for quotes and even write it for them if they sign it. (I guess that's the way marketing is done now .) We can also ask them if they are willing to have bird education classes at their shops to show that we are willing to work with businesses. We aren't anti-capitalism but that's the way Fox News is seeing it. We also have to think about getting petitions circulating to submit to the Board of Supervisors. These businesses can circulate the petitions if they are supportive of the ban. Let me know if any of these businesses will be definitely be losing money with a ban. We'll focus on the others. Thanks, Karen M. Watkins

1 0