It would probably be worth our time to eventually develop 'disabled' users who just don't show up in the user list. I'd rather not delete them, so we can maintain the associations in the DB. For now I'll alter our script to change the username of a disabled user to zz-oldusername -- so the disabled list appears at the bottom and we can distinguish them easily. Mal Raff wrote:

OK... understood... not good to have empty associations... But.. if we try to delete a user, will it tell us about those? If so, then any users that have NO associations can, in fact, be safely deleted. Is it worth the effort? The user list will eventually get very long otherwise.