Re: [Media-advisors] Checking in . . . .

We're all agreeing on stuff to be done. Good step 1! Now, who is signing up to *do* it?
Sent from my Peek - Pam
-------------------------------------
Karen Watkins

I will be glad to help on both items but didn't want to be presumptuous,
first wanted to see if others were on board.
--VH
-----Original Message-----
From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org
[mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Pamela Lee
Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 6:38 AM
To: media-advisors@mickaboo.org
Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Checking in . . . .
We're all agreeing on stuff to be done. Good step 1! Now, who is signing up
to *do* it?
Sent from my Peek - Pam
-------------------------------------
Karen Watkins

Hi all, I'm happy to help with press releases. We do need actual news to hang them on, however. If we send out press releases that aren't tied to a relevant (hopefully occasionally controversial) subject, pretty soon it will be like crying wolf. Papers are desperate for things to sell their papers, so it's important that we try to feed that machine. However, papers are also desperate for interesting, and especially free, articles. Maggie has written, for example, some great articles for the Marin IJ under the weekly Marin Humane Society column. It's possible that we could pre-write an article around an issue that would be news-worthy, and maybe a columnist would happily revise it slightly & publish it (or most of it). I'm not sure about this. It would be helpful if those of us with connections to columnists would see what might "play," or how we might engage in this, perhaps quarterly or something. p On Sep 7, 2010, at 6:38 AM, Pamela Lee wrote:
We're all agreeing on stuff to be done. Good step 1! Now, who is signing up to *do* it?
Sent from my Peek - Pam ------------------------------------- Karen Watkins
wrote: Thanks, Vinny. I have been thinking the same thing as I enjoy a chance to make progress on other things. I agree -- we need to work on these two documents. I believe Maggie is on this list now.
To: 'Mickaboo media advisor team' Subject: [Media-advisors] Checking in . . . .
Hi,
I hope that you are all having a good Labor Day holiday. As we are all aware, the proposed SF legislation on pet sales and the ACWC's discussions thereupon are on hold until next year. This has given many of us a chance to catch our breath and re-concentrate our focus on Mickaboo's core operations of rescue, rehabilitation and rehoming companion birds. (I know, mentioning "catch our breath" and "Mickaboo's core operations" in the same sentence could be considered an oxymoron.)
However, this Media Matters group had developed a few discussion and action topics which I think should continue to move forward as much as possible for the good of the organization. Specifically:
1.) Jonathan has drafted a "Lies and Misstatements" document. We were discussing the possibility of trimming this document to keep the attention span of the youtube generation, and finding appropriate distribution media (both web and printed) that would make this document portable and accessible.
2.) Patricia Blau created a press release, I believe Mickaboo's first, stating our support for the proposes SF legislation. We talked about creating more standardized press releases to document elements of our operations which our opponents tend to dismiss - for example, our strategic partnerships and activities with pet stores and shelters. It might even be a good idea, IMO, to publish high-level quarterly statistics about intakes, vet bills, etc. in press releases where they'd be readily available.
Both of these topics will require some writing, document formatting, technical infrastructure and web development. We discussed inviting Maggie Rufo to help us with the writing from a journalist's perspective, and mentioned Walt Boeninger as a possible candidate to do some of the web design and setup.
I haven't heard any discussion on these in weeks, since the on-hold announcement from ACWC. I know that we've all been busy and have reprioritized, but I wanted to ping the rest of you to see if we there's been any activity on these and, if not, to see if we can pick them up where we left off. I know that we all want to be ready when the arrows begin flying again, on the pet sale ban or any other topic. Having a history of relevant press releases and a document to clear up "misunderstandings" will give us a stronger starting position going into such fracases and will help us in the interim.
Thanks.
Vincent J. Hrovat

We do need actual news to hang them on
Agreed, absolutely. I was thinking of the following as newsworthy topics: -- Strategic new partnerships with pet stores or shelters. One example might be when we started doing classes and events at the WC PFE. Technically, this expanded an existing partnership but it gave us a bigger presence in the East Bay / Contra Costa County, which has been kind of a blind spot for us for a while. We might have to parse back and forth on the definition of "strategic" but, for starters, it needs to be more than a pickle jar for donations at their checkstand. -- Fairly major upcoming events such as adoption fairs, particularly those done in partnership with shelters. Again, we would have to decide, perhaps on a case=by-case basis, what constitutes a "major" event. One example for consideration is the multi-rescue adoption fair done at HSSV earlier this year. -- This is a new idea to the group, but I think that we should consider sending out quarterly press releases with some accurate but high-level statistics. I.E., Mickaboo took in 99 birds and spend $99K on veterinary bills in Q3 2010. Since we are a 501(c)3, this information is available to anyone who wants it anyway, but, as we have heard, there's a kneejerk accusation that we are a for-profit enterprise from people who didn't bother to -- and, frankly, didn't need to -- look up our numbers. Posting stuff like this in a press release makes us look more "corporate" (which , granted, some people might not like) and should minimize the frequency and impact of such accusations. It would also give us a much easier counter to such accusations: "Haven't you read our press releases?" Of course, each press release would mention other facts about Mickaboo and tenets of our mission and vision, all in context of the primary topic, and would feature quotes from Tammy, Michelle, et al. And, yes, some press releases would be somewhat redundant to the information that's on our "Upcoming Events" page. The advantage to a separate press release is that we could keep it for posterity and expound on the details of the event and other important information. With all of this in mind, does anyone have thoughts about what would be good fodder for our next press release? Is it too late to do write-ups on the Solano Stroll or Folsom Zoo presence? How about the Mickacoo fundraiser? --VH

Patti, this question is mainly for you but if somebody else has input that'll be great. I am not a PR or media person, so forgive me if this sounds naïve. I am wondering, if Mickaboo does press release type documents, whether we really need to distribute each of them to media sources for publication, or can we can simply post them on our web page for reference. Heres my train of thought: when I want to know about a company as a possible employer, possible investment, whatever I go to their web site and poke around. One of the places that I always look is in their list of press releases. I dont know or care what papers actually ran those stories, and I dont look for them in the mass media publications. I get them directly off of the principle companys web page. That is what I am thinking of for Mickaboo as well: a separate (simple!) section of our web page where we can post these press releases, along with links to mainstream media articles about Mickaboo, and maybe keep them available for 2-3 years. That would give us a distinct, low-impact place to keep this sort of information. Just because we post something out in such a "press-release" area, do we necessarily have to forward it to media as well? I am thinking that not all mainstream media is going to care each time that we do a Fall Furry Friends Flurry (or whatever) shelter event, but that we might still want to put together a press-release type of document regarding the event for organizational self-documentation and as a hedge against people who claim that we dont work with shelters. Thoughts? --VH -----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9:17 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Checking in . . . . Hi all, I'm happy to help with press releases. We do need actual news to \

For those things that we want the media to publicize, this strategy will not work. It seems to me we are talking about two different things. One is more of a "where can I find Mickaboo this weekend?" events calendar; the other are true press releases, which are done when you want things spread wide & far. Reporters/editors will not think to be checking the Mickaboo website every day, week, or, most likely, year. We need to offer to them items that they like (positive reinforcement) and that may help them sell papers (whether made of paper or published on the web). Thus, I recommend sorting the contacts (for example, there's a column in the Marin IJ which is called "Three things to do today!" and it lists various local things I can go to that might interest me. We might send our 'events calendar' materials to the person who organizes that column. They won't publish everything we send, but, if we don't send it, we can be sure none of our events will be published. Then the "real" reporter contacts need to be informed each time something notable happens. For example, Mickaboo Partners With Petco! Who Knew? is a press release they may run, and if it's not too busy a news day, we might get better placement. But that means connecting, personally, with reporters on a fairly regular basis. Occasionally an event may warrant a reporter's coverage, but probably not, unless there's a bigger "hook." p On Sep 7, 2010, at 10:08 PM, Vincent J. Hrovat wrote:
Patti, this question is mainly for you but if somebody else has input that'll be great. I am not a PR or media person, so forgive me if this sounds naïve. I am wondering, if Mickaboo does “press release” type documents, whether we really need to distribute each of them to media sources for publication, or can we can simply post them on our web page for reference.
Here’s my train of thought: when I want to know about a company – as a possible employer, possible investment, whatever – I go to their web site and poke around. One of the places that I always look is in their list of press releases. I don’t know or care what papers actually ran those stories, and I don’t look for them in the mass media publications. I get them directly off of the principle company’s web page. That is what I am thinking of for Mickaboo as well: a separate (simple!) section of our web page where we can post these press releases, along with links to mainstream media articles about Mickaboo, and maybe keep them available for 2-3 years. That would give us a distinct, low-impact place to keep this sort of information.
Just because we post something out in such a "press-release" area, do we necessarily have to forward it to media as well? I am thinking that not all mainstream media is going to care each time that we do a Fall Furry Friends Flurry (or whatever) shelter event, but that we might still want to put together a press-release type of document regarding the event for organizational self-documentation and as a hedge against people who claim that we don’t work with shelters.
Thoughts?
--VH
-----Original Message----- From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Patricia Blau Sent: Tuesday, September 07, 2010 9:17 AM To: Mickaboo media advisor team Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Checking in . . . .
Hi all, I'm happy to help with press releases. We do need actual news to \
participants (3)
-
Pamela Lee
-
Patricia Blau
-
Vincent J. Hrovat