California (and SF) have lead on many issues, but not as many as California (and SF) think.  In this case, it is energizing to know that the states in the middle are moving ahead.  Maybe we should point that out - that SF is falling behind.



On Mon, Jul 19, 2010 at 11:24 PM, Vincent J. Hrovat <1217@vhrovat.org> wrote:

Interesting stuff. I’ve heard a lot of people summarily write off the SF ban proposal as the product of an ultra-liberal political climate. Yet we see on PIJAC’s action page that similar legislation, either banning the sale of pets or increasing controls on stores that sell them, in Texas (two cities!), Ohio, Illinois, New York, Colorado . . .  none of which are known for their tree-hugging hippies.

 

--VH

 

From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Elizabeth Young


Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 10:44 PM
To: media-advisors@mickaboo.org
Subject: [Media-advisors] Looks like PIJAC is going to be pretty busy...

 

Lots of "issues of concern to the pet industry, hobbyists and pet owners" happening all over the country it looks like...