I think we have to have an official response that
Mickaboo is not responsible and we have not
tolerated illegal activities in the past and will
not tolerate it now.
From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org
[mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On
Behalf Of Michelle Yesney
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 11:03 PM
To: Mickaboo media advisor team
Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] URGENT Question
about Mickaboo
I think everyone is correct. If you would like,
Elizabeth, I would be happy to respond to Sally's
email in an official capacity. (I'm hoo-ome).
On Sun, Aug 8, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Elizabeth Y
wrote:
See below
_____
From: Sally Stephens
Sent: Sunday, August 08, 2010 7:18 PM
To: Philip Gerrie ;
SaveABunny@aol.com
Cc: Rose Harris ; Elliot M.
Katz DVM ; Elizabeth Young
; Sally Stephens
; Pam Hemphill
; Kim Flaherty
; Kat.Brown@sfgov.org;
jchick73@yahoo.com; Teresa Murphy
Subject: Re: Working Group Update August 8, 7 pm
FYI, I just heard from Ellen French that they're
getting threatening phone calls both at their
store and on their unlisted home phone. I think
she said three since Thursday. The threats are
that they will burn down either the store or the
home, that the caller knows where they live.
They've filed police reports with both SF and East
Bay police (they live in the East Bay) about the
phone calls. If you hear anything about who might
be responsible, please call the cops and tell
them. Threatening phone calls are absolutely
unacceptable, no exceptions, not to mention highly
immoral.
Elizabeth, they also said a woman who gave her
name as Virginia called their store today and said
she was with Mickaboo and she wanted to buy a
lovebird from their store. Do you have any idea
who that might be? I'm assuming this too was a
harassing phone call and not from Mickaboo since I
can't imagine why Mickaboo would be trying to get
birds from a store. Or did they misunderstand the
phone call and were you trying to place a lovebird
with them? Needless to say, they believe the phone
call really came from Mickaboo and it was intended
to harass them. Any ideas who might be behind
this?
-- Sally
