Thanks, Pam. I know that you had to scramble for a resource to publish the
latest issue of the newsletter and I appreciate your concern that we don't
have to do that again.

I know of another volunteer besides Walt who has indicated that they can
work on such things in the background. So there are a few possibilities. It
sounds like we first need consensus about how we want to present this for
maximum readability and impact before we get too deeply into technical
design.

--VH

-----Original Message-----
From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org
[mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Pamela Lee
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 2:15 PM
To: media-advisors@mickaboo.org; Media-advisors@mickaboo.org
Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Fwd: working group?

When you are ready- broach the subject with Walt Boeninger. He is the fab
volunteer who did the bang-up job with the newsletter
this quarter.

Sent from my Peek - Pam
www.getpeek.com
-------------------------------------
Vincent J. Hrovat<1217@vhrovat.org> wrote:

>That web presentation requires html-ish work - less plentiful
>resource than those who can do wiki work, but doable.

Pam, understood. I am optimistic that we could find an xhtml/css-literate
resource who could do this for us, especially since they have somewhat of a
headstart on design from the newsletter. This is an important strategic
document for our organization, IMO, and we should give it the best
agreed-upon presentation possible.

--VH

-----Original Message-----
From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org
[mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Pamela Lee
Sent: Monday, July 19, 2010 1:03 PM
To: media-advisors@mickaboo.org; media-advisors@mickaboo.org
Cc: vinny@vhrovat.org
Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Fwd: working group?

Elizabeth - I received your email.

Sent from my Peek - Pam
www.getpeek.com
-------------------------------------
Elizabeth Young<adoptkings@gmail.com> wrote:

Hello-

Is the <media-advisors@mickaboo.org> email addy working? I can't tell and
haven't gotten any replies to my queries.

Also- FYI, below is an email from SF ACW Commissioner Philip Gerrie about a
group he's creating to work towards the ban. After consulting with Michelle
and Philip, I'll be joining and sharing info from the group with y'all, just
FYI.

I'll be forwarding another email right after this one. I haven't even had
time to read the attachments yet but it looks interesting.

e

---------- Forwarded message ----------
From: Philip Gerrie <glassgerrie@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, Jul 16, 2010 at 10:25 PM
Subject: working group?
To: Elizabeth Young <adoptkings@gmail.com>
Cc: Pam Hemphill <pam.hemphill@gmail.com>, Kim Flaherty <
kflaherty@pacbell.net>, Rose Harris <harris.rose@att.net>

Hi Elizabeth et al, ( In lists of persons, *et al.* (an abbreviation of
*et
alii*, meaning "and others"))

I think it would be good to identify who wants to be active in making this
ban happen. Once identified, meet to strategize, etc before the next ACWC
meeting. I can only represent myself and not speak for the Commission. We
could do much of it via e-mail. I plan to be going to City Hall monday to
visit all the Supervisors about this as they have been bombarded by those
against the ban. It looks like PIJAC is a driving force. A David & Goliath
scenario? The minutes from the last meeting will be helpful. They will only
be available, though, when posted on the ACWC website. Pam, please let me
know if you think I am overstepping in any way doing this.

Thank you, Philip

--
Elizabeth

Until they all have homes, don't buy, don't breed- adopt.
www.RescueReport.org
www.MickaCoo.org
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QGjyooh3Yo0