Just to clarify - 


"Lies and Misstatements"  wasn't meant as a title for the document. It was only a subject label for discussion. 


I agree phrases such as "The Biggest Lie" and "Ridiculously False" are confrontational. Michelle had asked me to write something that responded to POPA's misrepresentations in a dispassionate voice, and those phrases do cross the line. 


We are in a confrontation, however, and while I agree our truths are strong enough to stand on their own, I'm not sure taking an entirely "positive" tone and burying the fact that these points are rebuttals is what is wanted here and now. Mickaboo's integrity is being attacked, our practices misrepresented. It is appropriate (and sufficient) that we respond to these lies in a dignified way with fact-based arguments. But I believe we should *respond* and be clear about that. We have a tougher argument to make than our opponents because we're trying to overcome people's naïve preconceptions as well as to counter POPA's scare tactics and slander. POPA can easily play on people's fears and prejudices. Because they will continue to spread their fear-mongering rhetoric, I don't see how we can persuade people effectively except by laying their narrative bare (it's already out there) and dismantling it point by point. If they want  to say "No, that's not what we mean," they will have to go further on the record, where their integrity and facts will be even more closely scrutinized. 


How we might use this document (as revised) is an open question. It could be shortened or pieces extracted for various purposes. But I do think  there is merit in retaining the "false-true" structure as originally envisaged, at least for some of our present purposes. 


Jonathan





-----Original Message-----
From: "Vincent J. Hrovat" <1217@vhrovat.org>
Sent: Jul 14, 2010 8:20 PM
To: 'Mickaboo media advisor team'
Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Lies and Misstatements draft

This describes a lot of important core facts about what Mickaboo is and has always been. I would remove the language about “BIGGEST LIE” and “RIDICULOUSLY FALSE” as confrontational and would consider giving this a more positive title like “Some Facts about Mickaboo” instead of “Lies and Misstatements.” IMO we could possibly go so far as presenting each of the points without first addressing the misstatement that is being countered. In other words, let our truths stand on their own. I think that they’re strong enough.

 

--VH

 

From: media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org [mailto:media-advisors-bounces@mickaboo.org] On Behalf Of Mary Long
Sent: Wednesday, July 14, 2010 2:35 PM
To: media-advisors@mickaboo.org; Jonathan Harris
Subject: Re: [Media-advisors] Lies and Misstatements draft

 

That is GREAT Jonathan.  The only thing I can think of to add (at this moment) in the paragraph where you talk about how easy it is to go in to a pet store and buy an animal - that these pet stores are only required by law to provide a care-sheet (which are often contain out-of-date/erroneous info) to send home with the animal.



--- On Wed, 7/14/10, Jonathan Harris <jonathanharris@earthlink.net> wrote:


From: Jonathan Harris <jonathanharris@earthlink.net>
Subject: [Media-advisors] Lies and Misstatements draft
To: media-advisors@mickaboo.org
Date: Wednesday, July 14, 2010, 1:14 PM

Here is a draft of the proposed "Lies and Misstatements" document. I did not answer every absurd point the opposition made, but tried to dismantle what I thought were the worst ones and the main ones they have woven together into their paranoid narrative. It is longer than I wish it were. It may be OK for our Web site. But if we want a 1-page informational flyer, e.g., it should be pared down. Another set of eyes probably could do that better than I could. You may want an entirely different introduction, or none, depending on the purposes for which we want to use the final version(s). Needless to say, the document also should be checked for the specific facts/statistics mentioned and the precise wording of certain terms. 

Jonathan

 

-------------

 

A great deal of misinformation is being spread about the growing number of homeless, unwanted birds in the Bay Area. Since the San Francisco Animal Welfare Commission first mentioned adding small animals, including birds, to a proposed ban on the sale of dogs and cats in the city, a coalition of breeders and pet store owners has attempted to dismiss the problem and to discredit the organization whose representatives brought it to the commission's attention, Mickaboo Companion Bird Rescue. In testimony before the commission, in letters, flyers, and emails, they have repeatedly distorted and misrepresented the practices and purpose of this nationally respected rescue group, while denying the existence of any crisis in unwanted birds and trying to obscure its root causes. 

 

By their account, hardly any homeless or unwanted birds exist here (or anywhere else in the US). The crisis, they say, is an illusion created by rescue groups like Mickaboo for our own purposes. Mickaboo's agenda, they claim, is to profit from the adoption fees we charge; pet stores — which offer customers greater choice — are "competitors" for bird sales, and Mickaboo wants to destroy these independent businesses, limiting people's access to birds. Mickaboo's "high" fees and "burdensome" adoption procedures are what create the appearance of a crisis, since they discourage adoption and produce a backlog of unadopted birds. Mickaboo is a radical Animal Rights group whose ultimate goal is nothing less than the complete prohibition of pet ownership. 

 

This narrative is false from start to finish. Some parts actually contradict others (why should we want to prohibit pet ownership if our goal is profit from people adopting our birds?). Much of it is paranoid, some of it absurd. None of it withstands any comparison with reality. But it is not simply inaccurate, it is dangerously wrong in diverting attention away from the real, emerging crisis in our city and around the country. If you care about animal welfare or your rights to have companion animals, please compare their misstatements with the facts. 

 

THE BIGGEST LIE: There is no crisis of homeless birds. Their numbers in shelters are insignificant compared to impounded dogs and cats.

THE TRUTH:  There is a huge and growing crisis of unwanted birds. It has taken four centuries for the numbers of homeless dogs and cats to reach the levels they have in America today. The explosion of domestic parrot populations (now estimated at some 40-50 million in US homes) has occurred only in the past 20 years, driven by the rise of large-scale breeders and pet retailers in the 1990s. As people who purchased birds on impulse confront the difficulties and cost of caring for these complex, demanding, essentially wild animals, more and more are relinquishing them, sometimes illegally releasing or simply abandoning them. Most of these birds never reach shelters, dying from untreated illnesses and neglect at home or from starvation or predation when released. The problem has worsened during the current housing crisis and recession, as people losing their homes are simply abandoning birds, sometimes entire aviaries, at an alarming rate. Craig's List is filled with ads for unwanted birds. Mickaboo's annual intake numbers have gone from about 35 in 2002 to an estimated 400 this year. If that growth rate continues, the number will reach 4,000 by 2018. Rescue groups and shelters cannot absorb such growth. Mickaboo currently has almost 400 rescued birds needing homes, and our volunteers' space to house them is at capacity. Recently we have been forced to impose a moratorium on the intake of cockatiels, although we know of many who need our help. All the while, more birds continue to be bred and sold. 

 

FALSE:  Mickaboo hates pet stores and wants to drive them out of business.

THE TRUTH:  Mickaboo hates the mistreatment of animals; we do not hate not pet stores. We don't want to ruin businesses, especially small, independent ones; we just want them to stop selling commercially bred birds. There are other business models pet stores can follow that don't involve selling bred animals. In the Bay Area we have both chains (Pet Food Express) and independent stores (For Other Living Things, Santa Clara) that provide goods and services for companion animals, as well as pet stores (Andy's, San Jose) that sell only re-homed animals). We regret the effect banning bird sales might have on the income of pet stores and their employees, many of whom genuinely love animals. However, the issue cannot be reduced simply to the economic interests of these stores. So long as pet stores promote birds as easy-care or "starter" pets, they will create unrealistic expectations, frustrated owners and countless miserable, unwanted birds. Moreover, even the most responsible pet sellers — stores that treat their birds well and provide good information and guidance to prospective buyers — are supplied by and support large breeding operations that rival puppy mills in life-long cruelty toward their captive breeding animals. Such extreme mistreatment of highly intelligent, emotionally sensitive creatures cannot be justified, tolerated, or supported, even indirectly. 

 

RIDICULOUSLY FALSE:  Mickaboo earns profits through its adoption fees. 

THE TRUTH:  Mickaboo is a 501(c)3 organization, run entirely by volunteers. It does not make money on anything, nor does anyone who works for it. Even without physical facilities or paid employees, the cost of our rescue work is staggering. Many of our rescued birds need expensive and prolonged medical treatment, and Mickaboo spends on the order of $10,000 per month for veterinary care. Adoption fees defray a small fraction (less than 15%) of those costs. The rest comes mainly from donations and few, small fund-raisers. Our finances are a matter of public record. What the records do not show are many additional costs that Mickaboo's volunteers absorb themselves — food, transportation and toys for their foster birds — to say nothing of the countless hours of skilled and loving labor they give to emotional rehabilitation and socialization, getting once neglected and abused animals to trust people again. 

 

FALSE: Mickaboo's "high" adoption fees and "burdensome" procedures discourage adoption.

THE TRUTH: Mickaboo's adoption fees are in most cases less than what the same bird would cost if purchased from a pet store or breeder. Our adoption procedure requires people to take a basic bird-care class, fill out a questionnaire, be interviewed over the phone, and have a home visit. We do not consider such requirements burdensome, in light of the past treatment some of our birds have suffered, the investment we have made in rehabilitating them, and the lifelong commitment we make to their welfare. Nor should anyone who is serious about having birds in their home, given the long-term responsibilities their care demands. We are not trying to put up barriers to adoption. Our goal is to educate adopters and to be sure they are able and willing to provide safe, healthy, and permanent homes for our birds. Certainly it is easier to walk into a pet shop and buy a bird than it is to adopt from us or any other reputable rescue organization.  But it is exactly that kind of impulse buying we want to discourage. A person too impatient to go through an adoption process is probably not patient enough to care for a parrot. Someone unwilling to pay a modest adoption fee is not likely to spend the great deal of money that avian veterinary care will cost.  

 

FALSE: Mickaboo refuses to work with pet stores on finding solutions. 

THE  TRUTH:  Besides working with most of the Bay Area's animal shelters, Mickaboo cooperates with several local stores, including Pet Food Express, Andy's Pet Shop in San Jose, and For Other Living Things in Santa Clara, holding our public classes and adoption fairs at their facilities. We are grateful to anyone else trying to help animals in need, and we will be happy to work with other pet stores as soon as they stop selling live, bred animals. We feel it is not helpful to promote businesses that continue to sell commercially bred birds, thereby creating the tragic problems we are working so hard to solve. 

 

FALSE:  Mickaboo is ideologically opposed to people having pets and wants to outlaw it. 

THE TRUTH:  Mickaboo was founded and is run entirely by people who love animals and have many in their own homes. We could not devote the hundreds of hours and thousands of dollars to rescue and rehabilitation work if we didn't. Our concerns are simply that people make informed choices about acquiring birds and be committed to giving them the attention and care they need. We support responsible pet keeping in many concrete ways. MIckaboo's Web site offers a wealth of information on bird behavior, health and care for the public to read and download. Mickaboo teaches free classes in basic bird care about every two weeks at locations around the Bay Area. We also offer classes on more advanced topics ranging from foraging to lighting to understanding bird body language. And every person who fosters or adopts a bird from Mickaboo automatically becomes part of an active Web-based discussion group providing support, expert, personal advice, and sometimes emergency help to volunteers and their birds. Mickaboo needs more caring, responsible people, not fewer, to join us in adopting and fostering homeless birds — ours as well as the many beyond our reach.  

 


-----Inline Attachment Follows-----